Win the pitch with the real thing.
Send a live link instead of forty slides describing an interactive idea nobody can feel — then build the delivery from the same graph.
Win it, make it, version it — one graph.
Pitch something the client can actually open
An interactive idea dies in a deck, because a still of an experience is not the experience. Send a link instead — opened on their own phone, shown to the person who signs. And what you made to win it is a working graph, so delivery starts from what the client already said yes to.
Cut the bespoke build time that eats project margin
Most interactive projects are a fresh custom build, and the custom build is where the budget goes. Here the engine, the deploy path and the operator surface already exist — so your team spends its hours on the idea rather than on plumbing it has written before.
Every market from a table, not a translation round
Locale, copy, currency and launch time live as data, and the layout adapts to the string it is actually given — so a long translation doesn't break a composition the client signed off in English. Adding the fourteenth market is a row, not a fortnight.
Hand the client controls, and get their edits back as versions
Expose the handful of things they're allowed to change and lock the rest, so the revisions round happens without a call. The link opens the editor rather than a viewer, and when they save it lands in your history as a real version rather than an attachment called final_v3.
AI across the work, under direction
Generation is an operator wired into what it feeds — copy lines, textures, backgrounds and variation sets, made inside the same graph as the layout and art-directed by the parameters around it. It runs on your own key, or your own hardware when a client's contract asks for that.
The version that performed becomes the Recipe
When something works — a scroll mechanic, a variant structure, a launch page — save it and the next brief starts there. Recipes travel between clients while each project stays its own system, so reuse is craft rather than copy-paste with the logo swapped. A genuinely different idea still means a new setup, not a tweak.
What you make with it.
One campaign, sized and localised in one run.
Author the template once. Then anyone on the team picks a product, a market and a message — and generates the whole set.
Turn one campaign into every asset at once
The hero, the product and the brand system are parameters, not layers. Change the colourway or headline once and regenerate the set — every ratio, placement and duration — instead of re-cutting each by hand. The first build is real work, a day rather than an afternoon; everything after it is a re-run.
Localise from a table, not a hand-off
Markets live as data: locale, copy, currency, launch time. Layout adapts to the string it's actually given, so a long German headline doesn't break the composition someone approved in English. Type is a real engine underneath — your installed fonts, not a web-safe list, with kerning held per pair through an edit.
Real motion and 3D, not just resized stills
Because it's a procedural engine rather than an image model, the same template emits animation, turntables and 3D — the variants a flat template system structurally can't produce.
The campaign is a program, not a folder of files
The brief changes at 5pm on a Thursday — a new market, a shorter cut, a different hero product. You change the rule that produced the set, not the sixty files it produced. The work is the setup; the deliverables are what falls out of running it.
The fiftieth deliverable costs what the second did
A campaign structure that worked is worth keeping. Save it as a Recipe and the next launch opens on a working set-up rather than an empty graph.
Fill the calendar without dropping the quality.
Ship every aspect ratio from one idea, then react to whatever's performing while the moment is still live.
Every ratio from one idea
Feed, story, reel, thumbnail. The layout is computed, not pinned to a canvas size, so the composition recomposes for each placement instead of being dragged into shape nine times.
Batch weeks of content in one run
Put the month in a table — the product, the line, the date, the offer — and generate against it. A quarter of posts is a run, not a rota. What used to be a fortnight of assembly becomes a set you review.
React fast without going off-brand
When something is live and the window is hours wide, you don't have time to build from scratch and you can't afford to skip approval. Change the input, run the graph, ship the set — the brand rules came along with it.
The brand system is enforced by the graph, not by review
Type, colour, spacing, logo clearance and safe areas are operators, not a PDF someone is meant to have read. Off-brand output isn't caught later — it isn't a thing the setup can produce.
Save the format as a Recipe and re-run it each drop
A format that performed becomes a Recipe, so next month opens on the one that already worked rather than on an empty calendar.
The pitch, and everything after you win it.
Today
The pitch is a deck and a mood film. Everyone in the room agrees it looks great, and nobody has touched the idea. If you win, the build starts from zero — a fresh custom stack, a new deploy path, and a prototype that gets thrown away.
With nooodles
What you pitched is what you ship. The client played with it before the award; delivery continues from the same graph; and the revisions round runs through a surface you chose rather than through your producer's inbox.
The deliverable itself can be the experience.
A variant set or a batch of renders is a workflow — the client's team takes the files and places them. The pitch you win with is a scene: live, in their hands, before anyone has budgeted the build.
The asset delivery
Variants, cutdowns and renders — files the client's team places across their channels.
- Mode
- Workflow
- Who opens it
- You and the client's team
The live piece
A page, a configurator, an embedded widget — the client's audience opens it and uses it. You hand over the running piece, and it stays yours to change when the next round lands.
- Mode
- Scene
- Who opens it
- Their audience
When something works, save it and run it again.
These ship with the beta — take one into a pitch and change the client's name.
Pitch Link
SceneSend the interactive idea instead of a deck.
Embed Widget
SceneDrop a live scene into an existing site.
Operator Panel
WorkflowExpose five controls and lock everything else.
Variant Matrix
WorkflowRun the full product × message × market grid.
Aspect Ratio Versioner
WorkflowReframe one master into every ratio and placement.
Locale Swap
WorkflowSwap copy, currency and market across a layout.
What comes up on the first call.
If our Recipes travel between clients, whose are they?
The technique travels; the client's work does not. A Recipe you save is the structure — how the thing is wired, what varies, what is locked — and it carries none of the assets, brand tokens, copy or data from the project you built it in. Each client's project stays its own system, so reuse looks like a studio getting better at something rather than one account paying for another's work.
Where the line sits between technique and deliverable is your contract with the client, not something we decide for you. If a client's agreement says the mechanic itself is theirs, that is the agreement.
Does the AI write the copy?
It generates copy lines, images, textures and backgrounds as operators inside the graph, so the prompt and the inputs are parameters you can key, bind and re-run rather than a box you type into and hope. Structured output means the result can drive something downstream instead of just being looked at.
What it will not do is decide the strategy or write the brief, and it cannot use a node type the engine does not have — so it builds with the toolkit rather than inventing one. It runs on your own key, and on your own hardware when a client's contract requires that material stays inside their environment.
Can we white-label the deliverable?
Mostly there's nothing to white-label — a view-only link opens chrome-less, so your client sees the work, not our interface. What carries our name is the shell: the sign-in card on a protected link, and the editor if you hand over an editable one. Your studio's name on those is a Studio and Enterprise thing we're still defining.
Who owns the work?
Your graphs, your Recipes and your output are yours — we don't take a claim on client work made in the tool, and your contract with your client governs what transfers to them. On the authorship question underneath it: in the US, purely machine-generated output has no copyright protection — the D.C. Circuit settled that in 2025 and the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal in 2026. Because a nooodles workflow is an explicit graph a person authored, the result carries documented human creative direction — the strongest authorship position AI-assisted work can hold.
Can clients edit it safely?
That's the hand-off. The author decides exactly which controls are exposed — a headline, a date, an image, a colourway — and locks the rest. The client gets those controls and nothing else, so they can make the change they want without reaching anything that would break the piece. The link opens the full editor rather than a viewer, so they can see how it works if they want to — and who is allowed to open it is a setting you can change afterwards, without changing the URL you already sent.
How fast can a team pick it up?
If your people already work in any node-based tool, the model transfers immediately — operator families, a cook graph, typed connections. The genuinely new part is that the web document is a family too. Start from a Recipe, take it apart, and build the next pitch from what you learned.
What happens when the brief changes halfway through?
You change the setup and re-run it. Because the campaign is authored as a system rather than assembled by hand, a new market, a swapped hero product or a shorter cut is an edit in one place followed by a regenerate — not a pass back through every ratio and every locale. The version that lands is the version everything else was made from.
How is this different from a template or banner-versioning system?
Those version pre-rendered, mostly-2D files and ad tags. nooodles is a procedural engine, so the same template emits real motion, 3D and interactive output — and can also build the live experience the campaign points at, which a flat template system can't do at all.
From the pitch to the fourteenth market.
Tell us what you're chasing and how you'd normally present it. We'll show you what the live version looks like, with your idea rather than ours.
We're choosing a few agencies to build alongside
Tell us what you're chasing and how you'd normally present it. You get a direct line to the people building the engine, we get to find out where it bends under a real deadline, and paid work is licensed while early access runs.
No spam. A real reply from a human.